- Joined
- Jul 13, 2021
- Messages
- 3,715
- Location
- Huntsville, Alabama
- Pronouns
-
- She - Her
- Discord
- Josi#9711
Will the Hall still “report” to the Keeper?
We have to start trusting our leadership eventually.
The applicants we have took the plunge and stepped up to volunteer without having a single inkling that the demand of this position may change.
I think the big thing here is that there are probably people who have the time and capacity to do a great job as COO but didn't want to deal with the membership and public figure part of things that the new CMO will need to deal with but the COO won't. *points to the threads in the Executive Meeting Discussion forum*
We have so many talented individuals here who want to give back and contribute, and that is fantastic! In the end however, we recognize that no one stays in these types of positions forever (except perhaps for Toral... ) so this will come up again in the future.
even if we might get a couple more by reopening, it didn't offset the downsides of timing etc and trying to get someone up and going in these positions as quickly as possible.
We don't HAVE to do anything. No one has to trust anyone
I know at least some of us are bothered by the impression that leadership is more concerned with doing things fast than doing things right.
Seconded.nametobedecided (can we keep this name? )
The CMO will be the officer in charge of the Hall.Will the Hall still “report” to the Keeper?
Sorry you guys please don't hate me, I wish I could just be happy/trust like you say but this is still bothering me.
If the need for a split decision was known this summer, why wasn't it created then?
Oh, yeah I guess I should say I would NOT have applied for either had they been posted appropriately.
I'm not poking at this because I have a chip on my shoulder.
Another question I think was about where the Hall will now fall on the org chart, and yep it will side step over as staff members under the CMO.
Yes, we'd already advertised Keeper, and like I said in a previous post, that was most likely an error, so we need to work with what we have and learn for the future.
Alex is absolutely correct - no one *has* to trust, no one *has* to agree.